| “Non-Public
Income Deposit Securities (A New Financing Option
for Private Companies)” |
«BACK |
 |
by Dennis L. Monroe |
|
| |
from January 2005 Restaurant Monitor |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Recently, there has been a great deal of discussion
concerning a new type of security known as Income Deposit
Securities (IDS) or Enhanced Income Securities (EIS). An
IDS is a publicly-traded (AMEX) combination equity
and debt security designed to enable companies to distribute
a substantial amount of their free cash flow to investors.
IDS’ have been in use in Canada for some time
but only recently debuted in the United States capital
markets.
To date, IDS’ have been offered
for sale by only a few restaurant industry companies,
including Davco, the large Wendy’s franchisee,
Carrolls Corp., the large Burger King franchisee and
concept owner, and Buffets, Inc. As with any
registered securities offering, the process of listing
IDS’ on a national exchange has made it difficult
for these and other companies to successfully navigate
the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC)
complex registration process, and thus only a few of
the offerings filed with the SEC have made it to the
public market. In the case of Davco, Carolls Corp.
and Buffets, Inc., additional investment-related issues
eventually prevented IDS’ from being sold to
the public.
Even though it appears that public capital
markets are not as receptive to IDS’ as was once
originally thought, use of a private IDS, or what I
call a “Private
Income Deposit Securities” or “PIDS,” could
be a very attractive alternative to traditional methods
of capital raising in the private sector. The following
discussion describes the PIDS and the characteristics
of a successful PIDS offering.
Like an IDS, a PIDS has
two components, a common equity component and a subordinated
note component, which are bundled together to create
the PIDS. PIDS
holders receive dividends on the common equity portion
as well as a fixed interest payment on the debt component.
When the dividends and interest payments are combined,
they provide an overall blended return or yield to
the investor.
Raising capital through a PIDS offering is attractive
for several reasons. On the investor side, the cash
distribution model of the PIDS itself can decrease
the amount of time it takes for an investor to receive
a return on its investment, a significant issue for
many long-term investors in privately held companies.
On
the company side, the sale of PIDS would generally
not require registration of the PIDS with the SEC, which
in and of itself drastically reduces the financial
and human cost of capital raising and gives the issuing
company more flexibility with respect to the sale.
In addition, if properly structured, the issuing company
will be able to take a tax deduction for the interest
payments on the debt portion of the PIDS.
The
issuing company’s ability to deduct for tax
purposes the interest payments on the debt component
of the PIDS is a critical aspect of the PIDS structure;
if for some reason the PIDS’ subordinate notes
are not characterized as debt, then the interest payments
on the notes would not be tax-deductible by the company
and would result in some degree of double taxation. A
key factor to ensuring that PIDS interest payments
are tax deductible is to structure the PIDS such that
the debt component of the PIDS can be separated from
the equity component.
Let’s look at how this
great idea may be used by a mature, large, multi-unit
franchisee or other multi-unit retail and restaurant
concepts.
The type of companies that are good candidates for PIDS:
- Companies with a good track record of predictable
and sustainable cash flow;
- Companies with moderate or limited needs for capital
expenditures;
- Companies that would use the funds to either de-leverage
the company or create liquidity for existing owners;
or
- Companies with strong, proven management.
Description of a PIDS Offering:
Let us look at an example of how a company might structure
a PIDS.
Company XYZ is a 100-unit franchisee of King Cleaners
(“KingClee”). The opening balance
sheet for KingClee is:
Current Assets |
$ 5,000,000 |
Fixed Assets after
depreciation |
55,000,000 |
Total
Assets |
$60,000,000 |
|
|
Current Liabilities |
10,000,000 |
Current Long-Term
Debt |
20,000,000 |
Common Stock |
30,000,000 |
Total
Debt and Equity |
$60,000,000 |
The income statement for KingClee is:
Gross Sales |
$100,000,000 |
Costs of Goods Sold
and Labor |
60,000,000 |
G&A and other
selling expenses |
20,000,000 |
Net
Profit |
20,000,000 |
Current interest
expenses and capital improvements |
5,000,000 |
Net
Cash Flow |
$15,000,000 |
KingClee issues $50,000,000 of PIDS units in a private
offering ($10,000,000 of common equity and $40,000,000
of subordinate debt). The debt carries an interest
factor of 10% and matures in ten years. The company
uses the $50,000,000 to pay down debt of $20,000,000,
and buy out some existing shareholders of $30,000,000
for a total of $50,000,000.
The balance sheet
after the issuance of the PIDS is:
Current Assets |
$ 5,000,000 |
Fixed Assets after
depreciation |
55,000,000 |
Total
Assets |
$60,000,000 |
|
|
Current Liabilities |
10,000,000 |
Subordinate Notes
(IDS) |
40,000,000 |
Common Stock |
40,000,000 |
Treasury Stock (buyout
of some shareholders) |
(30,000,000) |
Total
Debt and Equity |
$60,000,000 |
Key factors for a successful PIDS offering:
- The debt interest payments are a legal obligation
of the vote; and need to be paid according to the
terms, presumably quarterly.
- The cash flow payments to the equity component
of the PIDS have to be a priority. The issuing
company must adopt a policy of distributing out most
available cash flow after payment of the subordinate
debt interest, reasonable reserve and moderate capital
expenditures.
- The issuing company must be able to deduct for
tax purposes the interest on the subordinate notes
portion of the PIDS (using the KingClee example,
take a tax deduction of $4,000,000 of interest expense
on the subordinate notes (10% x $40,000,000).
- The subordinate notes should come due in eight
to ten years and require the issuing company to pay
off the notes at their face value.
- The equity portion of all PIDS offered for sale
would probably have a common ownership interest of
about 20% with voting rights.
- The equity portion of the PIDS could provide the
company a right to call the equity portion of the
PIDS (the right to buy it back) after the debt portion
of the PIDS has been paid off (presumably eight years). This
call right would provide for a premium in the neighborhood
of 40% over the original issue price.
As you can see, this type of investment provides a
wonderful opportunity to get cash into the company. In
most cases it will not inhibit the company from doing
other moderate borrowings. PIDS keeps control
of the company in the hands of the original owners
and takes advantage of the present desire of many investors
to have predictable cash flow. PIDS is a significant
investment option to the restaurant industry. For
those companies who meet its requirements, a PIDS is
something that should be considered.
A
PIDS offering would not be subject to the SEC’s
registration requirement if an exemption from registration
was available. The most common exemptions are sales
of securities made pursuant to Regulation D of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
availability of a Regulation D exemption depends
on a number of factors, including the net worth
and financial sophistication of investors, number
of investors and the dollar amount of securities
being offered. Any company proposing to offer equity
or debt securities of any type should be sure an
exemption to the registration requirement applies
and that it conducts the sale of securities in
compliance with all federal and state securities
laws applicable to the sale of private securities.
|